Bond Joins Community Voices at EPA Summit on PFOA
Hundreds of residents gathered in Exeter, NH, for a two-day summit on perfluorinated compounds like PFOA. Hosted by the EPA, this inaugural summit brought together impacted communities, state agencies, and EPA leaders to discuss the ongoing response to PFOA contamination in New England and beyond.

Associate Director of CAPA David Bond was given the stage to share Bennington's experience with PFOA contamination, including how 51成人猎奇 of its science classroom to this nearby environmental problem. He presented along with representatives from other communities roiled in PFOA contamination, including Barnstable, MA; Westfield, MA; Dover, NH; and Merrimack, NH.
Bond鈥檚 comments drew praise from stage agencies, advocacy groups, and community members, and were quoted in , , and .
鈥淚t is entirely appropriate and thoroughly disappointing that Bennington and Merrimack share this stage tonight,鈥 said Bond, noting when Vermont started scrutinizing the ChemFab factory over complaints of air pollution in Bennington in the early 2000s, the company simply moved to Merrimack, NH. 鈥淚f we had been able to confront the problems of ChemFab in Bennington, we wouldn鈥檛 have the problem in Merrimack today.鈥
Bond bemoaned the 鈥渨hack-a-mole鈥 philosophy of toxic governance in the US, where polluting companies always seem one step ahead of environmental regulators.
鈥淐ompanies like ChemFab used to move across state borders to avoid environmental oversight. Today, they simply tinker with their recipe,鈥 said Bond, noting and the hundreds of new perfluorinated compounds in use across the US.
PFOA was phased out of US manufacturing in 2015 under pressure from the EPA. With chemical compositions that slightly differ from PFOA, these new perfluorinated compounds evade regulations but likely share the risk profile of PFOA.
鈥淭his is unacceptable. We need the EPA to regulate these toxins as a family,鈥 said Bond, who also discussed the recently published , which found current health guidance levels for perfluorinated compounds in drinking water may be too high. Currently, the EPA level is 70 parts per trillion (ppt) and VT is 20 ppt. The ATSRD report recommends 11 ppt. 鈥淭he trend line is clear: every new study of these chemicals lowers the acceptable level in our drinking water.鈥
These guidance levels play a crucial role within communities impacted by PFOA contamination: when PFOA is detected in drinking water, many state agencies use these guidance levels as the cutoff to determine who gets a filtration system and who does not.
Bond described how the new ATSRD guidance level translates into over 50 homes in the Bennington area that might now be told the PFOA levels in their drinking water are harmful.
鈥淚n 2016, we told these families that their water was fine and they did not get filtration systems. Are we are going to go back to them two years later and tell them that same water is now considered toxic?鈥 Bond asked EPA Administrators. 鈥淟et鈥檚 just cut through the nonsense: if these chemicals are in your water, you get a filter.鈥
This point drew what New Hampshire Public Radio described as the 鈥.鈥
Bond also contrasted New York鈥檚 response in Hoosick Falls to Vermont鈥檚 response in Bennington.
鈥淲hile NY State fumbled the issue 鈥 delaying a response long after the evidence demanded it, confusing residents with an uneven response to PFOA, and collecting tremendous amount of environmental and health data from residents but not disclosing what they鈥檝e found 鈥揤ermont has been present, transparent, and effective since day one. Vermont鈥檚 response is a model for the rest of the nation,鈥 said Bond.